What Are the Different Types of Breast Implants and Which Is Best?
- Updated on: Jun 3, 2026
- 4 min Read
- Published on Jun 3, 2026
One of the first things that surprises people when they start researching breast augmentation is how many actual decisions are involved. It’s not just “bigger or smaller.” The type of implant, the material, the shape, the profile, the placement — all of these affect the final result in ways that aren’t obvious until someone walks you through them.
Here’s a plain-language breakdown of what the main implant options actually mean, and how surgeons typically help patients choose between them.
Saline vs. Silicone: The Core Decision
Both saline and silicone implants have an outer shell made of silicone. The difference is what’s inside.
Gummy bear implants are a form of silicone — specifically highly cohesive silicone gel that holds its shape even when cut. They’re firmer than standard silicone and shaped anatomically (tapered at the top, fuller at the bottom), which some patients prefer for a more natural contour.
Round vs. Anatomical (Teardrop) Shapes
Round implants are symmetrical — the same fullness at the top and bottom. They tend to produce more visible upper pole fullness (the area above the nipple) which many patients want. Because they’re round, rotation isn’t an issue.
Anatomical or teardrop-shaped implants mimic the natural breast shape more closely — less fullness at the top, more at the bottom. They’re typically used with highly cohesive gel and have a textured surface to prevent rotation. If they do rotate, the shape becomes visible, which is a clinical consideration worth discussing.
Most surgeons find that round implants placed under the muscle naturally take on a somewhat teardrop appearance due to the muscle coverage, which is part of why round implants remain the more common choice.
Smooth vs. Textured Surfaces
Smooth implants move freely within the pocket, which gives a more natural motion. They’ve been the standard for round implants for a long time.
Textured implants have a rougher outer surface designed to adhere to surrounding tissue and reduce movement — most commonly used with anatomical implants to prevent rotation. There has been research linking certain textured implants to a rare condition called breast implant-associated ALCL (BIA-ALCL). This is something to discuss directly with a surgeon, as the risk profile varies significantly by implant brand and surface type.
Implant Profile: Low, Moderate, High
Profile refers to how much the implant projects forward from the chest wall for a given base width. A high-profile implant projects more and sits narrower. A low-profile implant projects less and sits wider.
Profile selection is typically guided by the patient’s chest width and the amount of projection they want. Getting this right is part of what produces a proportional result — and it’s one of the reasons implant sizing isn’t just about picking a cup size.
Over vs. Under the Muscle
Implant placement affects both appearance and recovery. Under the muscle (submuscular) placement provides more natural coverage over the implant — reducing rippling visibility and making mammograms easier to read — but typically comes with a longer recovery and more initial discomfort. Over the muscle (subglandular) placement has a shorter recovery and can produce more upper pole fullness, but requires adequate breast tissue to provide coverage.
A dual-plane technique — partially under the muscle — is a common middle ground that combines benefits of both.
So Which Type Is Actually Best?
There isn’t a universal answer. The best implant for any given patient depends on their anatomy, their goals, their existing breast tissue, and their lifestyle. That’s exactly why the consultation matters as much as it does.
According to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, breast augmentation is consistently the most performed cosmetic surgical procedure in the US — and outcomes are most closely tied to how well the implant choice is matched to the individual patient’s anatomy and expectations.
For patients considering breast implants in Beverly Hills, Dr. Jimmy S. Firouz focuses on a detailed consultation to assess body shape, breast tissue, and the patient’s desired outcome. This personalized planning helps achieve natural-looking, long-lasting results.
Recovery and Longevity: What Patients Usually Want to Know
Implant choice influences more than appearance. It also affects recovery expectations and long-term maintenance considerations. Different implant types, placement methods, and surgical approaches can shape how recovery feels during the first few weeks after surgery.
Patients commonly ask how long implants last. The answer is more nuanced than many people expect. Breast implants are durable medical devices, but they are not considered lifetime devices. Some people keep the same implants for many years without issues, while others eventually choose revision surgery because of changes in preference, implant age, capsular contracture, rupture, or natural shifts in breast tissue over time.
This is another reason consultation and planning matter so much. A decision that works well today should also make sense for the patient’s anatomy, lifestyle, and expectations several years down the line. Understanding both the short-term recovery picture and the long-term considerations helps patients approach breast augmentation with a clearer sense of what the procedure actually involves.
Conclusion
Choosing a breast implant isn’t one decision — it’s a series of them, each affecting the final result in a real way. Understanding the options before your consultation puts you in a much better position to have a productive conversation with your surgeon and ask the right questions. The goal is always a result that looks and feels proportional to your frame and consistent with what you actually want — and that takes more than just picking a size.










